buy synthroid overnight synthroid online without prescription order synthroid online without prescription valtrex online pharmacy buy valtrex without prescription where to buy valtrex online order zoloft online without prescription zoloft for sale buy discount zoloft order lamisil lamisil online no prescription buy lamisil rx prozac online no prescription prozac online without prescription buy prozac free shipping propecia no prescription propecia for sale propecia propecia buy buy priligy rx priligy online without prescription priligy overnight shipping lasix overnight shipping buy lasix no prescription legal buy lasix online buy tadalafil no prescription overnight tadalafil online no prescription generic tadalafil retin-a retin-a buy buy retin-a without prescription buy generic retin-a order sildenafil online without prescription buy sildenafil online without prescription buy sildenafil online cheap strattera online overnight strattera online no prescription order strattera online mastercard buy neurontin overnight delivery neurontin online no prescription buy neurontin cheap buy discount nolvadex buy nolvadex online generic nolvadex buy zovirax no prescription overnight zovirax online pharmacy buy zovirax tablet
div class=

Question from Steve Kirsch – Nuclear power plants.


“you want 3 TW of new nuclear.

that’s a 2.3GW plant every week for 25 years…
you have 1X 3GW plant a week for 25 years which would overshoot your goal.
am i missing something?”

First, and to be clear, I don’t “want” 3TW.  In doing the numbers on what would be required to stay under 450ppm of CO2 it looks like you need to create 11.5-12TW of clean power as well as keeping demand at current levels (16TW).  I tried to agnostically apportion that 11 discount tramadol how to buy tramadol online buy tramadol us .5 TW across known working technologies, solar PV, solar thermal, wind, geothermal, nuclear, and biofuels.  It’s a thought experiment, and I would be happy with any solution for climate change, hence more or less of any one of these is fine with me as long as it all adds up.  And yes, 450 isn’t necessarily a [...]

Plastic waste to fuel?

Another link with a question mark from Tim O’Reilly.  He does like to antagonize me:

$10 per barrel oil sounds awesome.  But… with everything that sounds too good to be true I think I’d like to ask a few more questions:

My reply:

Awesome.  (If true, and we gather all plastic) that can cover around 0 cheap tramadol how to buy tramadol online cheap tramadol .5% of our oil use for transportation.  Very likely it’s a plasma or similar type of gasifier “infrared energy”.  hmm that could be interpreted as just heating it…  About 0.5% of oil is used for making plastics, so best case, that’s what you’d get back if we gathered all of it.


probably the reason their $10 a barrel is a believable number is that they get paid $160/tonne for disposing of the waste (that’s a typical number in the US).  So if it costs $140 to process ultram canada [...]

Green Buildings, a question from Graham Hill.

This request came from my friend Graham Hill at Treehugger:

I am wondering if we are not quite looking at the right metrics when it comes to building click here how to buy tramadol online tramadol cod s being green. And i’d be interested in your thoughts. and ideas about who would really know a lot about the lifecycle/energy considerations of buildings.

Here’s what I think we should be looking at from a carbon perspective: I think we want a measurement of CO2 Emitted per person hour. Here’s how you might figure it out:

(Total Building CO2) = (CO2 of Embodied energy of materials used) + (CO2 of Energy used in construction) + (CO2 of Energy used throughout building’s life) + (CO2 of Energy used to disassemble bldg at end of life) – (CO2 of Embodied Energy of materials reclaimed at end of building’s life)

(Total Building Person Hours) = (Number Building “Users” [...]

Subscription Options

Subscribe via RSS