The discussions about a carbon tax, or a cap-and-trade system, tend to revolve around “putting a price on carbon,” which is to say, charging polluters money for dumping carbon into the atmosphere. But how should that money be used? Here’s a graph from Vattenfall, the Swedish power company, showing which solutions buy valium online no prescription today buy valium online usa valium online uk become cost-effective at a price of €40 per ton of carbon dioxide buy priligy thailand visit us buy priligy nz .generic valum online order valum america generic valum
The yellow section has improvements that pay for themselves, since they’re generally based around not burning fuel to begin with ativan online prescription buy ativan mexico purchase ativan online . The green section has the improvements that will be cost-effective at the €40 price, and the blue section has the more expensive solutions.
I haven’t verified any data that went into this graph, which is based on McKinsey’s greenhouse gas abatement cost curves, so I can’t comment on how realistic the numbers are where to buy ambien without prescription buy ambien online canada cheap ambien overnight delivery . But from an energy literacy point of view, it gives a nice graphical depiction of how a price on carbon would make certain options more economically feasible tramadol generic how to buy tramadol online prescription tramadol .