The discussions about a carbon tax, or a cap-and-trade system, tend to revolve around “putting a price on carbon,” which is to say, charging polluters money for dumping carbon into the atmosphere. But how should that money be used? Here’s a graph from Vattenfall, the Swedish power company, showing which solutions click here buy valium online usa order valium america become cost-effective at a price of €40 per ton of carbon dioxide buy priligy canada visit us buy priligy australia .buy valum us order valum america cheap valum online
The yellow section has improvements that pay for themselves, since they’re generally based around not burning fuel to begin with ativan pharmacy buy ativan mexico cheap ativan online . The green section has the improvements that will be cost-effective at the €40 price, and the blue section has the more expensive solutions.
I haven’t verified any data that went into this graph, which is based on McKinsey’s greenhouse gas abatement cost curves, so I can’t comment on how realistic the numbers are cheap ambien buy ambien online canada buy ambien canada . But from an energy literacy point of view, it gives a nice graphical depiction of how a price on carbon would make certain options more economically feasible generic tramadol online how to buy tramadol online there .