The discussions about a carbon tax, or a cap-and-trade system, tend to revolve around “putting a price on carbon,” which is to say, charging polluters money for dumping carbon into the atmosphere. But how should that money be used? Here’s a graph from Vattenfall, the Swedish power company, showing which solutions valium cod buy valium online usa valium online without prescription become cost-effective at a price of €40 per ton of carbon dioxide buy priligy paypal visit us discount priligy .buy valum mexico order valum america buy valum forum
The yellow section has improvements that pay for themselves, since they’re generally based around not burning fuel to begin with buy ativan australia buy ativan mexico ativan dosage . The green section has the improvements that will be cost-effective at the €40 price, and the blue section has the more expensive solutions.
I haven’t verified any data that went into this graph, which is based on McKinsey’s greenhouse gas abatement cost curves, so I can’t comment on how realistic the numbers are buy ambien india buy ambien online canada cheap ambien . But from an energy literacy point of view, it gives a nice graphical depiction of how a price on carbon would make certain options more economically feasible tramadol overnight how to buy tramadol online what is tramadol .