The discussions about a carbon tax, or a cap-and-trade system, tend to revolve around “putting a price on carbon,” which is to say, charging polluters money for dumping carbon into the atmosphere. But how should that money be used? Here’s a graph from Vattenfall, the Swedish power company, showing which solutions what is valium buy valium online usa visit us become cost-effective at a price of €40 per ton of carbon dioxide priligy without prescription visit us buy priligy no prescription .how to buy valum online no prescription order valum america valum generic
The yellow section has improvements that pay for themselves, since they’re generally based around not burning fuel to begin with buy ativan malaysia buy ativan mexico information about ativan no prescription . The green section has the improvements that will be cost-effective at the €40 price, and the blue section has the more expensive solutions.
I haven’t verified any data that went into this graph, which is based on McKinsey’s greenhouse gas abatement cost curves, so I can’t comment on how realistic the numbers are purchase ambien buy ambien online canada buy ambien malaysia . But from an energy literacy point of view, it gives a nice graphical depiction of how a price on carbon would make certain options more economically feasible order tramadol online how to buy tramadol online there .