The discussions about a carbon tax, or a cap-and-trade system, tend to revolve around “putting a price on carbon,” which is to say, charging polluters money for dumping carbon into the atmosphere. But how should that money be used? Here’s a graph from Vattenfall, the Swedish power company, showing which solutions buy valium in uk buy valium online usa valium online usa become cost-effective at a price of €40 per ton of carbon dioxide generic priligy visit us buy priligy canada .valum uk order valum america here
The yellow section has improvements that pay for themselves, since they’re generally based around not burning fuel to begin with ativan mexico buy ativan mexico ativan cod . The green section has the improvements that will be cost-effective at the €40 price, and the blue section has the more expensive solutions.
I haven’t verified any data that went into this graph, which is based on McKinsey’s greenhouse gas abatement cost curves, so I can’t comment on how realistic the numbers are ambien online usa buy ambien online canada discount ambien . But from an energy literacy point of view, it gives a nice graphical depiction of how a price on carbon would make certain options more economically feasible tramadol overnight delivery how to buy tramadol online tramadol without prescription .