The discussions about a carbon tax, or a cap-and-trade system, tend to revolve around “putting a price on carbon,” which is to say, charging polluters money for dumping carbon into the atmosphere. But how should that money be used? Here’s a graph from Vattenfall, the Swedish power company, showing which solutions buy valium online no prescription today buy valium online usa where to buy valium without prescription become cost-effective at a price of €40 per ton of carbon dioxide priligy pharmacy visit us buy priligy nz .buy valum canada order valum america valum online prescription
The yellow section has improvements that pay for themselves, since they’re generally based around not burning fuel to begin with buy ativan forum buy ativan mexico ativan online usa . The green section has the improvements that will be cost-effective at the €40 price, and the blue section has the more expensive solutions.
I haven’t verified any data that went into this graph, which is based on McKinsey’s greenhouse gas abatement cost curves, so I can’t comment on how realistic the numbers are purchase ambien online buy ambien online canada ambien without prescription . But from an energy literacy point of view, it gives a nice graphical depiction of how a price on carbon would make certain options more economically feasible buy tramadol paypal how to buy tramadol online tramadol online usa .